eric at bodden.de
Thu Feb 26 04:39:39 EST 2004
I have seen your posting and have read it and actually I don't think that
you offended anybody and neither is anybody unwilling to comment on anything
not related to AspectJ. You only have to accept that most people here are
hardly familiar with AOP concepts in other languages.
Regarding the content of your posting: I see your point and yes, it's
interesting, however I would not see it as a breakthrough because IMHO it
only describes a kind of _implementation_ of an AOP-specific feature (cflow)
in AOP itself. And that for sure is not new. Also I think that nobody is
really gonna want to trade the "syntactic sugar" of a cflow for what you
propose - I think you see that yourself. So your proposal can really "only"
be seen as an implementation in my eyes. Also it would still need to be
shown how efficient that one is.
RWTH Aachen University
ICQ UIN: 12656220
PGP key: http://www.bodden.de/pub_key.asc
More information about the discuss