[aosd-discuss] More on AOP for .NET
Corpening, Owen
Owen.Corpening at amd.com
Thu Jun 15 11:14:37 EST 2006
My apologies - but that is the sort of answer I was looking for. Most
folks wind up somehow disqualifying one of these AOP .Net alternatives
and so I am looking for the ones which are unqualified "ready".
I am definitely including NAspect in my list now. Sorry again, it is
Very hard just looking at all these alternatives to properly
differentiate them.
owen
________________________________
From: discuss-bounces at aosd.net [mailto:discuss-bounces at aosd.net] On
Behalf Of Roger Johansson
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 10:30 AM
To: discuss at aosd.net
Subject: Re: [aosd-discuss] More on AOP for .NET
Hi,
Can you define "production envitonment usage" ?
For example , We use NAspect in our O/RMapper NPersist for lazy load,
dirty tracking and databinding support etc etc.
And NPersist is very much in production environments.
so every app that uses NPersist is aspect oriented, atleast at domain
model level.
We have about 1000 downloads on the puzzleframework each month and the
biggest NPersist application that I know of has around 150K users.
So when can one consider it "used in production environment" ?
regards,
//Roger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discuss_aosd.net/attachments/20060615/321960f4/attachment.html
More information about the discuss
mailing list