[aosd-discuss] on the need for formalization
SainTiss
saintiss at arklinux.org
Thu Nov 30 04:06:55 EST 2006
Hi all,
I'm looking for papers supporting the claim that:
"There is a need for a precise an elegant way to express AOP language
constructs in terms of an underlying execution model".
In other words, it would be useful to have an elegant and precise formalism
which makes it easy to express e.g. the semantics of cflow. Easier, for
example, than implementing it in Java (or its VM).
Do people on this list support this claim, and if so, has there been any work
in the past pointing out such need?
Thanks in advance,
Kind Regards,
Hans
--
A liberal is a person whose interests aren't at stake at the moment
-- Willis Player
Hans Schippers
Research Assistant of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO - Vlaanderen)
http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~hschipp/
Formal Techniques in Software Engineering (FoTS)
University of Antwerp
Middelheimlaan 1
2020 Antwerpen - Belgium
Phone: +32 3 265 38 71
Fax: +32 3 265 37 77
More information about the discuss
mailing list